As of September 23rd elektron-users has been replaced by elektronauts.com. Find out what this means here.
Go to bottom Post Reply
TOPIC: mpc
#9758
Game & Watch
Posts: 4248
0
Re: mpc 18 Years, 2 Months ago
True JB...some of the old MPCs didn't need the layering to sound fat...I think the new ones do.
  The topic has been locked.
#9762
Kong
Posts: 1312
mr. applehead
Re: mpc 18 Years, 2 Months ago
thats interesting, i didnt know the xl sounded any different. ive only used the 2000 before and i have an s2000 gathering dust and an s612 that died. might just have to give up on the sampler idea and get a midi sequencer with cv gate outs instead. maybe its no tougher to get the black case here - just more expensive. its not such a bad idea though..
  The topic has been locked.
#9787
King Koopa
Posts: 283
Re: mpc 18 Years, 2 Months ago
surely not trying to talk you out of a machine you might really enjoy. really, i wouldn't mind another mpc1000 at some point. as for sound comparisons, here's the way i see it (anyone else, please step in if you feel otherwise)...

rough similarities in sound(??):

[8 and 12-bit samplers]
MPC-60, SP-12/1200, older Emulators, s612, s700/750, s900/950, older Rolands (s330), tx16w, Mirage, RZ-1, DDD-1, etc

[early/mid 16-bit samplers]
MPC-3000, s1000, Casio FZ, EPS-16, ASR-10, e4/64/etc, later Rolands (s760), etc

[mid/later 16-bit and 24-bit samplers]
MPC-2000/xl/1000/4000, s2000/5000/6000, z4/8, v-synth, a3000/4000/5000, etc

i'm missing a bunch of models and maybe a few could be in a different spot, but this is how i've generally thought of hardware samplers when it comes to 'thick, mid, and thin' sounding. raw in/out sound, not figuring filters or anything else into it. i think the MD/UW would fit somewhere into the first or second group.
  The topic has been locked.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop

Login Form

start Player