Elektron-Users

Hope this is not too far off-topic:
I am a new OT owner and am curious to know if they are implementing any/many of these suggestions? I am not a programer so I don't really know how difficult it would to make these suggestions workable. I see many wonderful and thoughtful suggestions, but are people seeing a good response from Elektron? Or do they have a different set of priorities? I am so new that I am not hitting the same walls as most other folks--at least not yet. Reading these suggestions helps me know what is possible or not and you can have my OT when pry it from my cold dead hands! becoming a fanboy. So much so, that I am thinking really hard about the Monomachine.
Thanks in advance for any responses.

Ask yourself why this thread is 87 pages... and you'll have your answer.

Probably been asked before but I would like to see an effects machine like the ones in the mono, i am really not that in love with the reverb in the octatrack but if i could lose a machine to free up some dsp for machine based effects processer that would be very cool..

You could always resample afterwards to get the machine back for sample duties.

I'd quite like to see some new machines in general that allow for interesting use of the dsp for sample destroying purposes.

I agree, the current FX are a bit bland, especially the reverb.

isjtar wrote:
I agree, the current FX are a bit bland, especially the reverb.

Reverb ok, thats right... But for snares, far enough...

All other effects, exept the flanger (from my point of view) are, are quite well..... It depends always on the material which is used with the fx

I think elektron would need more programmers to cope with all this request, maybe the users want too much in this machine implemented, this is not a software like ableton

I'm thinking of compiling all these into a monolithic Google Doc. Is anyone doing something similar already?

Here's the layout I have in mind: a big list of the requests in chronological order, with the text of the original post (or section of the post), its author, and a link to it. Anyone posting "+1" or the like will have their username listed under it, and if they create a request that seems identical instead of +1ing, a link to that post will be on their username. For the sake of time and effort, noncommittal responses like "Sounds cool", etc. would just be ignored.

Requests that are related to previous requests somehow - whether they are very similar, are an extension of a previous request, or perhaps could possibly be implemented using the same feature - will be highlighted and linked to the original related request.

After all posts are compiled, requests should be sorted in descending popularity, and the most +1ed will float to the top.

Thoughts??

@license:

good idea. I don't know to what degree Elektron cares about this thread when programming more features, but your idea could increase relevance.

MK7 wrote:
good idea. I don't know to what degree Elektron cares about this thread when programming more features, but your idea could increase relevance.
That's the plan. I don't see any point to keep piling on requests in this thread's current state. I would hate to read through its 87 pages if I was a dev. The least we could do is make it easier to parse.

(oops-please ignore)

For the sake of your sanity, I would start with requests that have been posted since 1.2 came out. A ton of stuff earlier in the thread has been implemented, and Elektron is well aware of things like midi scenes that people have been requesting all along.